Pentagon says climate is a Military issue

Officials from the United States Military representing the in-power Trilateraloid oligarchical faction say that anthropogenic global warming is an issue that has national security implications for the US, and hence consideration of it ought to be incorporated into national security and foreign policy.

The public propaganda efforts have been taken up by the Trilateral organ, the New York Times, with the running of an article on Aug 8th.

"The sense that climate change poses security and geopolitical challenges is central to the thinking of the State Department and the climate office," said Peter Ogden, chief of staff to Todd Stern, the State Department’s top climate negotiator.

The policies will be premised on the fraudulent anthropogenic global warming theory, that humans are the cause of temperature increases and climate change in general.

Critics have pointed out that the approach of justifying the intertwining of the military with the global warming theory seems designed to provide a seemingly legitimate basis for an increased scope of military and intelligence operations for political, geopolitical and geostrategic purposes which could not have otherwise been instituted.

Amanda J. Dory, the deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy, who is working with a Pentagon group assigned to incorporate climate change into national security strategy planning, said the past year has seen a "sea change" in the military's thinking about climate change, indicating the change of power from the Neocon oligarchical faction, to the Trilateraloids.

The former head of CENTCOM under Trilateraloid President Bill Clinton, General Anthony C. Zinni, has written a report for private advisory think tank, CNA, that states “We will pay to reduce greenhouse gas emissions today, and we’ll have to take an economic hit of some kind, or we will pay the price later in military terms, and that will involve human lives.”. General Zinni is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.